🔗 Share this article

As dawn was breaking the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, representatives remained trapped in a windowless conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in tense discussions, with dozens ministers representing various coalitions of countries ranging from the poorest nations to the wealthiest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as weary delegates acknowledged the harsh reality: they would not reach a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The latest global climate summit faced the brink of total collapse.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for well over a century, the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels is warming our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during over three decades of annual climate meetings, the crucial requirement to halt fossil fuel use has been referenced only once – in a agreement made two years ago at Cop28 to "move beyond fossil fuels". Representatives from the Gulf states, Russia, and multiple other countries were resolved this would not occur another time.

Increasing pressure for change

Meanwhile, a growing number of countries were equally determined that advancement on this issue was vitally needed. They had developed a proposal that was attracting growing support and made it apparent they were ready to stand their ground.

Less wealthy nations desperately wanted to move forward on securing funding support to help them address the growing impacts of climate disasters.

Critical moment

By the early hours of Saturday, some delegates were ready to leave and force a collapse. "We were close for us," stated one energy minister. "I was ready to walk away."

The critical development occurred through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Near 6am, key negotiators split from the main group to hold a closed-door meeting with the chief Saudi negotiator. They urged language that would subtly reference the global commitment to "move beyond fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

Instead of explicitly mentioning fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the Dubai agreement". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly accepted the wording.

The room collapsed into relief. Cheers erupted. The deal was finalized.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took a modest advance towards the gradual elimination of fossil fuels – a hesitant, insufficient step that will scarcely affect the climate's continued progression towards disaster. But nevertheless a notable change from total inaction.

Key elements of the agreement

• Complementing the subtle acknowledgment in the official document, countries will begin work a plan to phase out fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will deliver findings next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to remain below the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries obtained a threefold increase to $120bn of regular financial support to help them cope with the impacts of climate disasters
• This sum will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "equitable change process" to help people working in polluting businesses transition to the clean economy

Varied responses

With global conditions approaches the brink of climate "tipping points" that could eliminate habitats and throw whole regions into chaos, the agreement was far from the "giant leap" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the right direction, but in light of the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," stated one climate expert.

This imperfect deal might have been all that was possible, given the international tensions – including a Washington administration who shunned the talks and remains aligned with oil and coal, the growing influence of nationalist politics, ongoing conflicts in various areas, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic instability.

"Major polluters – the fossil fuel giants – were at last in the crosshairs at the climate summit," says one environmental advocate. "There is no turning back on that. The opportunity is available. Now we must convert it to a actual pathway to a safer world."

Significant divisions revealed

Although nations were able to celebrate the formal approval of the deal, Cop30 also revealed major disagreements in the primary worldwide framework for addressing the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are consensus-based, and in a period of global disagreements, agreement is increasingly difficult to reach," commented one senior UN official. "It would be dishonest to claim that this summit has provided all that is needed. The disparity between where we are and what evidence necessitates remains dangerously wide."

If the world is to avert the worst ravages of climate crisis, the international negotiations alone will prove insufficient.