🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from chaos. While he is called Mikhail, the implication is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list featured various figures, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier version led local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it might seek to question.